In 2019, a team of urologists at the University of Southern California did something the supplement industry would rather nobody did. Chase Clemesha and colleagues bought a shelf. They pulled the fifty most visible testosterone-boosting supplements they could find online, catalogued every ingredient across all of them, 109 unique components at an average of 8.3 per bottle, and then walked each one over to PubMed to ask a simple question: is there any published evidence this does what the label says?
Ninety percent of the products claimed to boost testosterone. Only 24.8 percent contained a component with data showing an increase. About 10.1 percent contained something with published data showing a decrease. For 61.5 percent, there was no data at all, in either direction, on any human being. Meanwhile the bottles themselves were absurdly overdosed: a median 1,291 percent of the recommended daily allowance for vitamin B12, 272 percent for zinc, and thirteen products exceeding a tolerable upper intake limit for at least one ingredient.
That is the honest baseline for this subject. The demand curve for higher testosterone is vastly steeper than the evidence curve, and the gap between them has been filled with gunmetal-colored bottles and Latin roots. Which is a genuine shame, because the real literature here is more interesting, more quantitative, and considerably more useful than anything printed on those labels. It just happens to point somewhere nobody can package.
The things that reliably move a man's testosterone, in rough descending order of leverage, are his body fat, his sleep, his alcohol intake, his energy availability, and his micronutrient status. Nearly everything else is a rounding error or a rumor. Here is what the evidence actually supports, including the parts that undercut the advice you have probably already been given.
The Number You Are Chasing Moves All Day
Before any intervention, a word about the measurement, because a startling amount of biohacking discourse consists of men reacting to noise.
Testosterone is not a level. It is a pulsatile, circadian signal, secreted in bursts, rising through the night and peaking in the early morning. The Leproult and Van Cauter protocol described below had to sample blood every 15 to 30 minutes across a full 24 hours to characterize it properly. A single afternoon draw at a walk-in clinic is not a measurement of your testosterone so much as a snapshot of one moment in a moving system. This is why clinical guidelines call for morning samples, and why a diagnosis rests on two separate readings rather than one.
There is also the total-versus-free problem. Most circulating testosterone is bound to sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and albumin, leaving a small unbound fraction to do the actual work. SHBG rises with age and falls with obesity and insulin resistance, which means total testosterone can mislead you in both directions: an older lean man may look better on paper than he functions, and an insulin-resistant heavier man may look worse.
Then there is the claim that hangs over this entire field, that testosterone is collapsing generationally. It traces largely to Travison and colleagues, who analyzed the Massachusetts Male Aging Study in 2007: 2,769 observations from 1,532 men across three waves between 1987 and 2004, and found an age-independent decline of roughly 1 percent per year that survived adjustment for age, obesity, and smoking. It is a real and well-conducted finding. It is also not unanimous. An analysis of NHANES data covering a broadly similar period found no such decline in US men, and a Danish cohort likewise showed none. Two careful teams, similar calendar windows, opposite answers. Anyone who tells you the generational collapse is settled science is skipping a chapter.
The Biggest Lever Is the One You Can See
If you carry excess visceral fat, everything else in this article is a detail.
The mechanism is not mysterious. Adipose tissue expresses aromatase, the enzyme that converts testosterone into estradiol. More fat means more aromatase, which means more of your testosterone converted away, which suppresses the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis upstream, which lowers production further. It is a self-reinforcing loop, and endocrinologists have a name for the destination: obesity-associated hypogonadism.
The reversal is unusually well quantified for a lifestyle intervention. Corona and colleagues pooled 24 studies in the European Journal of Endocrinology in 2013. A low-calorie diet raised total testosterone by 2.87 nmol/L (95% CI 1.68 to 4.07), roughly 83 ng/dL. Bariatric surgery, with its far larger weight losses, raised it by 8.73 nmol/L (95% CI 6.51 to 10.95). Critically, multiple regression identified the degree of weight lost as the single best determinant of the testosterone gained. Not the diet composition. Not the exercise modality. The weight. A larger 2024 meta-analysis by Ken-Dror and colleagues in Andrology found the same dose-response and built nomograms from it, which tells you how consistent the relationship is: you can put it on a chart and read off an approximate answer.
The honest corollary is that this lever only exists if you have fat to lose. A lean, well-fed man who reads that weight loss adds 83 ng/dL and starts cutting will not get 83 ng/dL. He will get the effects described in the energy-availability section below, which are the opposite.
Sleep Is the Fastest Lever You Have
Fat loss takes months. Sleep works in days, in both directions.
The landmark demonstration is a 2011 research letter in JAMA by Rachel Leproult and Eve Van Cauter. Ten healthy young men, mean age 24, lean and screened for endocrine and sleep disorders, spent three nights in a laboratory with up to ten hours in bed, then eight nights restricted to five hours. Blood was drawn every 15 to 30 minutes across 24 hours at the end of each phase. After one week of short sleep, daytime testosterone fell by 10 to 15 percent, with the deepest trough between roughly 2 PM and 10 PM. Van Cauter's own framing was that sleep duration and quality are increasingly recognized as endocrine disruptors, which is a striking way to describe a Tuesday night.
Ten men is a small study, and it deserves to be labeled as such. But the direction is corroborated by the sleep-quality literature. Tančić-Gajić and colleagues studied 104 severely obese men in Frontiers in Endocrinology in 2021, all of whom underwent full polysomnography, and found that both the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index correlated significantly with total and free testosterone even after adjustment for age, BMI, and metabolic syndrome components. If you snore heavily, wake unrefreshed, or carry significant weight, sleep apnea is a plausible and treatable contributor.
Here the evidence does something useful and inconvenient. Treating apnea with CPAP does not reliably restore testosterone. A meta-analysis by Cignarelli and colleagues found no significant change in total or free testosterone with CPAP, which points back at weight as the underlying driver rather than the oxygen desaturation itself. Fix the apnea because untreated apnea is genuinely dangerous. Do not expect the CPAP machine to be a hormone intervention.
The Gym Works, Just Not for the Reason You Were Told
This is where the popular narrative and the literature part company most sharply, and it is worth walking through carefully, because the misunderstanding here is nearly universal.
Acutely, exercise absolutely raises testosterone. D'Andrea, Spaggiari, Barbonetti and Santi pooled 48 studies comprising 126 trials in the Journal of Endocrinological Investigation in 2020 and found a clear acute rise after moderate and high-intensity exercise. They gave it a memorable name: endogenous transient doping. Note both words. The effect appeared immediately to within about 30 minutes post-exercise, and then it was gone.
The obvious inference is that this transient spike is how lifting builds muscle. The obvious inference is wrong, and it has been tested directly. Daniel West, Stuart Phillips and colleagues at McMaster designed an elegant experiment published in the Journal of Applied Physiology: twelve young men trained their elbow flexors for 15 weeks, with each arm trained on separate days under deliberately different hormonal conditions. One arm did isolated curls designed to keep hormones at baseline. The other did identical curls immediately followed by a high volume of leg work, flooding the system with testosterone and growth hormone. Same arm exercise, same person, radically different hormonal milieu. After 15 weeks, muscle cross-sectional area and strength increased in both arms with no significant advantage to the high-hormone condition. A companion study found the same for muscle protein synthesis. Local mechanical signaling drives hypertrophy. The hormone spike is a passenger, not a driver.
Chronically, the picture is humbler still. Potter and colleagues pooled randomized controlled trials of insufficiently active men in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research in 2021 and found a negligible, non-significant effect of exercise training on resting total testosterone, unchanged by training mode, age, or body mass status. Hayes and Elliott, examining men aged 60 and over in Frontiers in Physiology, found that resistance training did not significantly influence basal testosterone at all, while aerobic and interval training produced small but statistically significant increases. That is precisely backwards from gym-floor folklore, where lifting is the testosterone activity and cardio is the thing that supposedly lowers it.
There is a real dose beyond which exercise turns on you. Chronic high-volume endurance training combined with insufficient fuel can suppress resting testosterone, a pattern described in the literature as the exercise-hypogonadal male condition and closely related to low energy availability. The failure mode is not lifting too heavy. It is training a great deal while eating too little for too long.
None of this is an argument against training. Resistance training is one of the best-supported interventions in all of health, and it builds the muscle and strips the fat that make the largest lever in this article work. It simply does not do so by chronically raising your resting testosterone, and choosing your program to chase a number on a lab report is optimizing for the wrong variable.
Eat Enough, and Do Not Eat Strangely
Diet influences testosterone mostly at the extremes, and the interesting finding is how far out those extremes are.
On dietary fat, the two best analyses disagree, and the disagreement is instructive. Whittaker and Wu, in the Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology in 2021, pooled six crossover studies in 206 men and found that moving from a high-fat to a low-fat diet lowered total testosterone with a standardized mean difference of -0.38 (95% CI -0.75 to -0.01, p=0.04), with a stronger effect in European and North American men (-0.52). Then in 2025, Soltani and colleagues published a larger analysis in the Journal of Food Science: 11 randomized controlled trials, 888 participants, and no significant difference in testosterone or any other sex hormone between low-fat and high-fat diets.
Both are defensible. The older analysis used mostly small, dated crossover studies, five of six published between 1979 and 2005, but the diets tested were genuinely extreme. The newer analysis is larger and uses the more rigorous randomized design, but it included women and clinical populations and more moderate fat intakes, which could dilute a male-specific effect at the low end. The reasonable synthesis is a threshold rather than a gradient: pushing fat down toward 20 percent of calories or below may cost you something, and anywhere in the normal 25 to 35 percent range almost certainly does not. Cholesterol and fat are the literal substrate for steroidogenesis, but you do not need to eat like a bodybuilder from 1985 to have enough.
On protein, a widely circulated claim holds that high protein suppresses testosterone. Whittaker and Harris reported in Nutrition and Health that very-high-protein, low-carbohydrate diets, above roughly 3.4 g/kg/day, sharply decreased resting testosterone. Read the threshold again. A 90 kg man would need to eat over 300 g of protein daily to reach it, well above the 1.6 to 2.2 g/kg/day that even serious lifters consume, and the finding rests on a handful of very small studies lasting days. This is not a caution for anyone eating a normal high-protein diet. It is a caution about a dietary pattern almost nobody actually follows.
Severe energy restriction is the real risk, and it is well documented. Berryman and colleagues studied 68 male US Marines, mean age 24.6, through seven days of near-total starvation during Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape training: roughly 300 kcal per day, about an 85 percent energy deficit. Mean testosterone fell from 17.5 nmol/L to 9.8 nmol/L in a week, and the men whose testosterone dropped into the low range lost more fat-free mass than those who maintained it. This is the mirror image of the weight-loss finding, and both are true. Moderate fat loss in a man carrying excess adiposity raises testosterone. Aggressive under-fueling in a lean man tanks it. The variable that reconciles them is not calories in the abstract, it is energy availability relative to what your body composition and training load actually demand.
The Micronutrient Floor Is a Floor, Not a Ladder
The consistent theme across zinc, vitamin D and magnesium is that correcting a deficiency helps and topping up a sufficiency does not. This distinction is quietly responsible for most of the confusion in the supplement aisle, because a study showing that repletion works in deficient men gets marketed to everyone.
Zinc's foundational study is Prasad and colleagues, 1996, in Nutrition. Dietary zinc restriction in young men dropped serum testosterone from 39.9 to 10.6 nmol/L over 20 weeks, and supplementing marginally deficient elderly men for six months raised it from 8.3 to 16.0 nmol/L. Those are dramatic numbers, and they are cited constantly. What is cited far less often is the sample size: the restriction arm involved four men, and the supplementation arm nine. This is a suggestive, mechanistically plausible, very small study that has been asked to carry a great deal of commercial weight. Notably, work on zinc-sufficient subjects has generally found no testosterone benefit from supplementation.
Vitamin D shows the pattern even more cleanly. Observational data consistently link higher vitamin D to higher testosterone. The randomized trials mostly do not. Pilz and colleagues reported a rise in 2011, but the better-controlled trial from Lerchbaum and colleagues in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism in 2017 found no significant treatment effect on total testosterone in healthy middle-aged men with normal baseline levels, and their 2019 follow-up in men with low testosterone found no effect either. Correct a deficiency, because vitamin D status matters for plenty of other reasons. Do not expect it to be an androgen intervention.
Magnesium has the thinnest evidence of the three. A small 2011 trial by Cinar and colleagues reported increases in free and total testosterone with supplementation over four weeks, with larger effects in men who exercised, and cross-sectional data associate higher serum magnesium with higher testosterone in older men. It is short, small, and not replicated at scale. Magnesium is cheap, widely under-consumed, and useful for sleep quality, which is itself a testosterone lever. Treat that as the reason to take it.
Cortisol, Alcohol, and the Cost of Being Wired
Testosterone and cortisol are functionally antagonistic, and the relationship is causal rather than merely correlational. Cumming, Quigley and Yen demonstrated it pharmacologically back in 1983, infusing cortisol into men and watching circulating testosterone fall acutely. Chronic stress adds a second mechanism upstream, suppressing GnRH release from the hypothalamus and therefore luteinizing hormone and everything downstream of it. This is why sleep debt, under-recovery and unmanaged psychological stress are not soft interventions filed under wellness. They are the same axis, approached from a different door.
Alcohol is dose-dependent in a way that gets misreported. A low dose, around 0.5 g/kg, can transiently raise testosterone through hepatic mechanisms, a finding that occasionally surfaces online as permission. It is a laboratory curiosity with no clinical value. Heavy acute intake suppresses testosterone within hours, and sustained heavy drinking suppresses it durably by damaging Leydig cells directly and disrupting the axis at every level, compounded by elevated HPA activity, oxidative stress and inflammation. If you are seriously pursuing this, binge drinking is not a neutral variable you can optimize around.
What the Aisle Is Actually Selling
Back to Clemesha's shelf, and the specifics.
Tribulus terrestris, the most recognizable name in the category, has repeatedly failed to raise testosterone in controlled human trials despite decades of marketing. D-aspartic acid produced early promising results that larger and better-controlled follow-ups did not reproduce, with at least one trial finding higher doses associated with a decrease. The general finding across systematic reviews of testosterone boosters is that the majority of products either have no supporting human data or contain ingredients studied only in rodents, and the leap from rat testis to a 40-year-old man in a parking lot is longer than the label implies.
Ashwagandha is the interesting exception, and it deserves a careful reading rather than a verdict. Lopresti and colleagues ran a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in overweight men aged 40 to 70 with mild fatigue, published in the American Journal of Men's Health in 2019. Over eight weeks, ashwagandha extract produced a 14.7 percent greater increase in salivary testosterone than placebo (p=0.010) and an 18 percent greater increase in DHEA-S (p=0.005). Those are real, statistically significant hormonal effects from a properly designed trial, which puts ashwagandha in a different category from tribulus entirely.
And yet. In the same trial, there were no statistically significant differences between ashwagandha and placebo on fatigue, vigor, or sexual and psychological well-being. Both groups improved; neither beat the other on how the men actually felt. That is the most instructive result in this entire article, and it generalizes: a hormone can move measurably without the person moving measurably. Testosterone is a means, not an end. If an intervention shifts a number on a panel and changes nothing you can perceive over two months, you have bought a data point.
The Plastics Question, Handled Honestly
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, principally phthalates and bisphenol A, have documented antiandrogenic properties in laboratory models, and the human data are worth stating precisely because they are usually overstated.
Woodward and colleagues analyzed 1,420 men in NHANES 2013-2016 for the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. Their headline result was null: phthalate metabolites were not statistically significantly associated with sex hormone concentrations among men overall. Associations appeared only within age strata, with low-molecular-weight phthalates linked to lower testosterone among men aged 20 to 39, and high-molecular-weight phthalates among men aged 60 and over, where each doubling of one metabolite sum corresponded to 7.72 percent lower total testosterone. Subgroup findings from an overall null result are hypothesis-generating, not conclusive, and this is cross-sectional data besides, so causality is unestablished.
The practical position: reducing exposure is cheap, carries no downside, and is justified by the mechanistic evidence even though the human evidence is unsettled. Do not heat food in plastic, moderate canned foods, and prefer fragrance-free personal care products. File it as a low-cost hedge, not a lever.
The Honest Protocol
Ranked by expected effect size, which is a different ordering than most protocols use.
If you carry excess visceral fat, that is the entire first phase and there is no close second. Everything the literature offers in the way of large, reproducible testosterone gains lives here. Pair it immediately with sleep, since it is the fastest-acting variable available and costs nothing: seven to nine hours, and a genuine screen for sleep apnea if you snore heavily, wake unrefreshed, or carry significant weight. Cut binge drinking in the same week. These three moves account for most of what is achievable without a prescription.
Then train, for the right reasons. Resistance work three to four times weekly for body composition, strength and healthspan, with the explicit understanding that its contribution here is via fat and muscle rather than via chronic hormonal elevation. Add aerobic and interval work, which in older men has marginally better evidence for basal testosterone than lifting does. Avoid the specific trap of a large caloric deficit combined with high training volume sustained over months.
On diet, the instruction is mostly negative: do not do anything extreme. Keep fat somewhere in the 25 to 35 percent range rather than pushing toward 20 percent or below. Keep protein in the ordinary 1.6 to 2.2 g/kg/day band. Do not crash diet if you are already lean.
Only then consider micronutrients, and only after testing. Get 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and zinc and magnesium if you have reason to suspect low intake. Supplement to correct a documented deficiency rather than prophylactically, and be aware that chronic high-dose zinc impairs copper absorption. If you want to try ashwagandha, try it with clear eyes: the hormonal effect is real, and the trial that established it found no symptomatic benefit over placebo.
Where the Evidence Runs Out
Three caveats deserve more prominence than they usually get.
First, nearly every impressive number in this article comes from men who were deficient, obese, sleep-deprived or starved at baseline. Interventions that repair a deficit produce large effects; the same intervention in an already-optimized man produces very little. A lean, well-rested, well-fed man who sleeps eight hours and lifts three times a week has largely spent the natural budget, and the remaining variance is mostly genetic and age-related.
Second, several landmark findings rest on remarkably few people. The sleep study had ten men. The zinc restriction arm had four. Meta-analyses are more trustworthy than single studies, and where meta-analyses themselves disagree, as with dietary fat, the honest answer is that we do not yet know.
Third, statistical significance is not the same as feeling different, which the ashwagandha trial illustrates better than any argument could. Testosterone is pulsatile and diurnal, and some reported changes sit inside normal assay and biological variability.
Finally, the part that matters most. If you have persistent symptoms, meaning low libido, ongoing fatigue, depressed mood or erectile difficulty, alongside two separate morning total testosterone readings below roughly 300 ng/dL (10.4 nmol/L), stop self-experimenting and see an endocrinologist or urologist. And see a doctor promptly, not in six months, if you have red flags suggesting a specific underlying cause: new headaches or visual changes, small or shrinking testes, infertility, or breast tissue development. Those warrant investigation, not optimization. This article is educational and is not medical advice, and the question of testosterone replacement therapy is deliberately outside its scope.
References
Clemesha CG, Thaker H, Samplaski MK. "Testosterone boosting" supplements composition and claims are not supported by the academic literature. World Journal of Men's Health. 2020;38(1):115-122. doi:10.5534/wjmh.190043.
Balasubramanian A, Thirumavalavan N, Srivatsav A, Yu J, Lipshultz LI, Pastuszak AW. Testosterone imposters: an analysis of popular online testosterone boosting supplements. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2019;16(2):203-212. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.008.
Travison TG, Araujo AB, O'Donnell AB, Kupelian V, McKinlay JB. A population-level decline in serum testosterone levels in American men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007;92(1):196-202. doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1375.
Trends in sex hormone concentrations in U.S. males: 1988-1991 to 1999-2004. NHANES analysis reporting no secular decline in testosterone. (PMC4137971.)
Corona G, Rastrelli G, Monami M, et al. Body weight loss reverts obesity-associated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2013;168(6):829-843. doi:10.1530/EJE-12-0955.
Ken-Dror G, Fluck D, Fry CH, Han TS. Meta-analysis and construction of simple-to-use nomograms for approximating testosterone levels gained from weight loss in obese men. Andrology. 2024;12(2):297-315. doi:10.1111/andr.13484.
Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Effect of 1 week of sleep restriction on testosterone levels in young healthy men. JAMA. 2011;305(21):2173-2174. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.710.
Tančić-Gajić M, Vukčević M, Ivović M, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with low testosterone levels in severely obese men. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021;12:622496. doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.622496.
Cignarelli A, Castellana M, Castellana G, et al. Effects of CPAP on testosterone levels in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2019;10:551.
D'Andrea S, Spaggiari G, Barbonetti A, Santi D. Endogenous transient doping: physical exercise acutely increases testosterone levels, results from a meta-analysis. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2020;43(10):1349-1371. doi:10.1007/s40618-020-01251-3.
West DWD, Burd NA, Tang JE, et al. Elevations in ostensibly anabolic hormones with resistance exercise enhance neither training-induced muscle hypertrophy nor strength of the elbow flexors. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2010;108(1):60-67. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01147.2009.
West DWD, Kujbida GW, Moore DR, et al. Resistance exercise-induced increases in putative anabolic hormones do not enhance muscle protein synthesis or intracellular signalling in young men. Journal of Physiology. 2009;587(21):5239-5247.
Potter NJ, Tomkinson GR, Dufner TJ, et al. Effects of exercise training on resting testosterone concentrations in insufficiently active men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2021;35(12):3521-3528. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004146.
Hayes LD, Elliott BT. Short-term exercise training inconsistently influences basal testosterone in older men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Physiology. 2019;9:1878. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01878.
Hackney AC. Effects of endurance exercise on the reproductive system of men: the "exercise-hypogonadal male condition." Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2008;31(10):932-938.
Whittaker J, Wu K. Low-fat diets and testosterone in men: systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2021;210:105878. doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2021.105878. (See corrigendum: 2026;255:106880.)
Soltani S, Hejazi M, Meshkini F, et al. The effect of low-fat diets versus high-fat diet on sex hormones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Food Science. 2025;90(5):e70266. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.70266.
Whittaker J, Harris M. Low-carbohydrate diets and men's cortisol and testosterone: systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition and Health. 2022. doi:10.1177/02601060221083079.
Berryman CE, McClung HL, Sepowitz JJ, et al. Testosterone status following short-term, severe energy deficit is associated with fat-free mass loss in U.S. Marines. Physiological Reports. 2022;10(18):e15461. doi:10.14814/phy2.15461.
Prasad AS, Mantzoros CS, Beck FW, Hess JW, Brewer GJ. Zinc status and serum testosterone levels of healthy adults. Nutrition. 1996;12(5):344-348. doi:10.1016/s0899-9007(96)80058-x.
Pilz S, Frisch S, Koertke H, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on testosterone levels in men. Hormone and Metabolic Research. 2011;43(3):223-225. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1269854.
Lerchbaum E, Pilz S, Trummer C, et al. Vitamin D and testosterone in healthy men: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2017;102(11):4292-4302. doi:10.1210/jc.2017-01428.
Lerchbaum E, Trummer C, Theiler-Schwetz V, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on androgens in men with low testosterone levels: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Nutrition. 2019;58(8):3135-3146. doi:10.1007/s00394-018-1858-z.
Cinar V, Polat Y, Baltaci AK, Mogulkoc R. Effects of magnesium supplementation on testosterone levels of athletes and sedentary subjects at rest and after exhaustion. Biological Trace Element Research. 2011;140(1):18-23. doi:10.1007/s12011-010-8676-3.
Cumming DC, Quigley ME, Yen SSC. Acute suppression of circulating testosterone levels by cortisol in men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1983;57(3):671-673.
Lopresti AL, Drummond PD, Smith SJ. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study examining the hormonal and vitality effects of ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) in aging, overweight males. American Journal of Men's Health. 2019;13(2):1557988319835985. doi:10.1177/1557988319835985.
Woodward MJ, Obsekov V, Jacobson MH, Kahn LG, Trasande L. Phthalates and sex steroid hormones among men from NHANES, 2013-2016. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2020;105(4):e1225-e1234. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa039.